INTRODUCTION

The concept of the first 1,000 days became popular in the early 2000s from global maternal and child nutrition initiatives. It identified the period from conception to a child’s second birthday as a critical window for improving survival, growth, and shaping lifelong health and development.^1,2 Since then, advances in neuroscience, developmental biology, epigenetics, developmental psychology and epidemiology have broadened the concept beyond nutrition to encompass nurturing care, early learning, responsive caregiving, and the social determinants of health.^3-7 Today, the first 1,000 days are widely recognized as a critical window that shapes lifelong health, development, and human potential.^3,4 During this relatively short period, rapid growth and biological programming occur across multiple systems, including the brain, immune system, endocrine pathways, metabolism, and socio-emotional development.⁵ Experiences during these early stages of life, whether positive or adverse, can have profound and lasting effects that extend into adolescence and adulthood.^6,8

Importantly, the first 1,000 days encompass more than survival and go beyond health alone. While reducing maternal and child mortality remains a key public health objective, increasing attention is placed on enabling children to thrive physically, cognitively, emotionally, and socially.^4,7 Early experiences influence educational attainment, economic productivity, social participation, and well-being throughout the life course.^9-11 However, developmental outcomes are shaped by complex interactions among biological factors, family relationships, education, community resources, social protection systems, and public policy.^3,4,7

The economic rationale is also compelling. Extensive evidence demonstrates that investments made during pregnancy and early childhood yield the highest returns for the individual and society.⁹ Early childhood development is increasingly recognized as the foundation for sustainable development and a key determinant of human capital at both individual and societal levels. Consequently, investment in the first 1,000 days has become both a public health priority and a societal imperative.^4,7

Objectives                                                                                                                                                     

This review examines the scientific foundations, developmental implications, and wider societal significance of the first 1,000 days. Specifically, the objectives of this narrative review were to 1) summarize the scientific evidence underpinning the first 1,000 days; 2) review key interventions that promote healthy development; 3) discuss the influence of social determinants and human capital; and 4) propose an integrated collaborative child health systems approach.

METHODS                                                                                                                                      

This narrative review summarizes current evidence relating to the first 1,000 days of life, early childhood development, and collaborative child health systems. We identified literature published primarily between 2000 and 2026 through searches of PubMed and publications from the World Health Organization and The Lancet Early Childhood Development Series. Search terms included combinations of first 1,000 days, early childhood development, brain development, nurturing care, nutrition, breastfeeding, early intervention, and social determinants of health. Landmark studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and international guidelines were preferentially included. We identified additional relevant references from the reference lists of retrieved articles. We synthesized narratively to provide an integrated overview of biological, developmental, social, and health system perspectives. Artificial intelligence-assisted image generation (ChatGPT, OpenAI) was used solely to assist in producing the conceptual framework presented in Figure 1; the authors undertook all scientific content, interpretation, and final editing. Ethical approval was not obtained for this narrative review because it synthesized published literature and did not involve human participants, human tissue, or identifiable personal data.

REVIEW FINDINGS

The review findings are presented within the conceptual framework shown in Figure 1. This framework illustrates how interventions from preconceptions through the first and next 1,000 days, together with nurturing care, social determinants, and collaborative child health systems, interact to shape lifelong health, development, and human potential.

Scientific Foundations of the First 1,000 Days

The scientific foundations of the first 1,000 days are supported by converging evidence from developmental biology, neuroscience, nutrition science, and early childhood development. This evidence encompasses fetal programming, early brain development, nutrition and health after birth, nurturing care, and early intervention, highlighting why this period offers a unique opportunity to optimize lifelong health, development, and human potential.

Antenatal Care

The first 1,000 days begin before birth. Maternal health and prenatal exposures play a critical role in affecting fetal growth, organ development, neurodevelopment, and future health outcomes.¹² The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease framework, which evolved from Barker’s Fetal Origins Hypothesis, proposes that environmental influences during fetal life can permanently affect physiological systems and future disease risk.^12,13 Undernutrition during pregnancy may program the body's structure, physiology, and metabolism, increasing the risk of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases in adulthood.¹³ Evidence from the historical Dutch Hunger Winter studies demonstrated that prenatal nutritional deprivation increased the risk of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases later in life.¹⁴ Furthermore, these developmental influences may have intergenerational and potentially transgenerational effects, stressing the importance of preventive, holistic, and family-centered interventions that begin even before conception.¹⁴               
Beyond nutrition, maternal infections, psychosocial stress, tobacco and substance use, and environmental exposures can alter fetal programming through epigenetic and metabolic pathways.^13,14 Consequently, fetal life represents a period of heightened developmental plasticity during which environmental influences can have lasting effects on health and development.^5,6

Evidence-based antenatal interventions can substantially improve outcomes.¹⁵ Adequate maternal nutrition supports healthy fetal growth and birth weight, while good hygiene and infection prevention reduce the risk of congenital infections.^1,2,16 Folic acid supplementation before conception and during early pregnancy reduces neural tube defects such as spina bifida.¹⁷ Maternal immunization against tetanus, pertussis, and respiratory syncytial virus provides additional protection for vulnerable young infants.^13,18

High quality maternal and child health services form the foundation for healthy fetal development and subsequent childhood well-being.¹⁶ By influencing fetal programming during a critical period of development, antenatal interventions contribute to safer pregnancies and deliveries, as well as to healthier developmental trajectories, reduced risks of chronic disease, and improved educational and socioeconomic outcomes throughout life.^2,16 Therefore, the foundations of lifelong health are established long before birth.

Early Brain Development and Biological Programming

Early childhood is characterized by rapid brain growth and remarkable neuroplasticity, during which neural connections are formed and refined in response to both genetic influences and environmental experiences.^5,6 Sensory pathways develop first, followed by language, cognitive, emotional, and executive functions. Consequently, the period from conception to two years of age forms a critical window of development during which environmental influences can have profound and lasting effects.⁵

Positive experiences, including responsive caregiving, secure attachment, language exposure, play, and learning opportunities, promote healthy brain development by strengthening neural networks.⁴ Responsive “serve-and-return” interactions between children and caregivers are particularly important, fostering language development, emotional regulation, social competence, and future learning.⁷ These repeated interactions shape the developing brain by experience, establishing the foundations for lifelong cognitive, behavioral, and socio-emotional well-being.⁵

By three years of age, the brain has reached about 80-90% of its adult volume.⁵ During this period, billions of neural connections are formed and refined in response to experience. While genes provide the biological blueprint for development, experiences shape how neural circuits are organized and strengthened. Consequently, early childhood experiences play a critical role in shaping cognitive abilities, psychological health, social functioning, and learning capacity throughout life.^3,4

The same neuroplasticity that creates opportunities for healthy development also makes individuals vulnerable to adverse experiences.⁶ During this sensitive developmental window, chronic stress, neglect, violence, and insecurity may disrupt brain development and become biologically embedded.⁶ Persistent activation of stress-response systems, particularly the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, may lead to dysregulated cortisol secretion, impaired immune function, oxidative stress, and chronic low-grade inflammation.¹⁹ Over time, these changes may increase the risk of long-term physical and mental health problems, including cardiovascular disease and other non-communicable conditions.^6,19

Adverse childhood experiences can also influence behavior through their effects on neurodevelopment. Impulsivity, poor emotional regulation, social difficulties, and engagement in health-risk behaviors may arise as adaptive responses to challenging environments.²⁰ Nevertheless, positive experiences, supportive relationships, and timely intervention can support resilience and help mitigate the effects of adversity, highlighting the significance of nurturing environments during the first 1,000 days and beyond.^6,8

Key Interventions that Promote Healthy Development

Healthy development during the first 1,000 days depends on timely, evidence-based interventions that support survival, growth, development, and well-being. Evidence-based interventions spanning nutrition, health, nurturing care, parenting support, and early identification provide practical opportunities to improve developmental outcomes and lifelong well-being.

Nutrition and Health After Birth

Nutrition is a cornerstone of healthy development throughout the first 1,000 days, affecting growth, brain development, immune function, and future metabolic health.^12-14 Despite substantial progress in maternal and child health, malnutrition remains a major global challenge, encompassing undernutrition (i.e., stunting and wasting), micronutrient deficiencies, as well as overweight and obesity.²¹ While maternal nutrition shapes fetal development, feeding practices during infancy and early childhood continue to influence developmental outcomes after birth.^10-12

Breastfeeding provides optimal nutrition, as well as important immunological, developmental, and psychosocial benefits. It has been associated with improved cognitive outcomes and reduced risk of obesity and type II diabetes later in life.^22-24 Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC), originally developed for preterm and low-birth-weight infants, combines prolonged skin-to-skin contact immediately after birth, breastfeeding support, and active parental involvement in care.²⁵ Together, breastfeeding and KMC illustrate how simple, family-centered interventions can improve survival, strengthen parent-infant bonding, and enhance long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes.^22-26

Appropriate complementary feeding after six months of age, adequate micronutrient intake, and food security further support healthy growth and development. Children with developmental disabilities, including autism spectrum disorder, are particularly vulnerable to nutritional problems because of feeding difficulties and restrictive eating patterns.²⁷ Early nutritional assessment and intervention are therefore important components of comprehensive child healthcare. Collectively, these nutritional interventions support healthy growth and development while improving health and well-being across the life course.

Vaccination is another cornerstone of child health during the first 1,000 days. By protecting infants and young children against vaccine-preventable diseases, immunization reduces mortality, morbidity, and disability during a critical period of growth and development.²⁸ As one of the most cost-effective public health interventions, vaccination helps ensure that children not only survive but also thrive.²⁹

Nurturing Care and Holistic Development

Healthy development requires more than adequate nutrition and medical care alone. The World Health Organization’s Nurturing Care Framework identifies five interrelated components essential for early childhood development: good health, adequate nutrition, responsive caregiving, opportunities for early learning, and safety and security.⁷ Together, these domains provide the conditions that enable children not only to survive but also to thrive. The Nurturing Care Framework represented an important shift in child health thinking by recognizing that responsive caregiving and early learning opportunities are not optional additions to child health services but fundamental requirements for achieving developmental potential.^5,7,30 It therefore encourages health systems to move beyond survival-focused approaches towards strategies that enable children to thrive.⁷

Children require emotionally secure relationships, responsive interactions, stimulation, play, and social inclusion.³⁰ In this context, parenting plays a central role in shaping developmental trajectories. Parenting interventions that encourage responsive caregiving, positive discipline, and parent-child interaction have been shown to improve behavioral, cognitive, and language outcomes.^31-33 Parenting skills, often assumed to develop naturally, can be strengthened through education, support, and community-based programs.^4,31,34

Concerns have also emerged regarding excessive screen exposure during early childhood.³¹ Although age-appropriate, high-quality digital content may offer educational value when used with caregiver involvement, excessive screen time can displace opportunities for responsive interactions, active play, adequate sleep, and social engagement that are essential for healthy development.^31-33 Parents and caregivers should therefore be supported in promoting balanced media use and prioritizing real-world interactions during the early years.^31,33

Furthermore, developmental opportunities do not end at a child’s second birthday. The “next 1,000 days”, spanning approximately two to five years of age, remain a highly sensitive developmental period characterized by rapid growth in language, executive functioning, emotional regulation, and social skills.¹¹ Continued nurturing care during these years can strengthen earlier developmental gains, foster resilience, and help mitigate the effects of previous adversity.^3,4,8 Child development should therefore be viewed as a continuous life-course process rather than a series of isolated stages, with each phase building upon the foundations established during the first 1,000 days.

Early Identification and Early Intervention

While nurturing environments promote healthy development, some children remain vulnerable because of biological, developmental, or environmental risks.³⁴ Early identification and intervention are therefore essential components of effective child health systems.³⁶ Timely recognition of developmental delays, disabilities, behavioral difficulties, nutritional concerns, and psychosocial vulnerabilities enables support during periods of maximum neuroplasticity, significantly improving developmental outcomes and reducing the risks of longer-term difficulties.^10,36,37 Conversely, delayed identification may result in missed opportunities to optimize developmental outcomes and well-being.

Developmental surveillance and screening should be integrated into routine maternal and child healthcare services.^36,38 Advances in screening tools and digital technologies are creating new opportunities for earlier identification of developmental concerns.³⁹ However, screening alone is insufficient. Early identification must be followed by timely referral pathways, family-centered intervention services, and continuity of care to ensure meaningful improvements in developmental outcomes.^7,30,36,38

Children with developmental disabilities often require coordinated support involving healthcare workers, educators, social services, and families.³⁸ Such multidisciplinary collaboration is particularly important in resource-limited settings where services are often fragmented. Linking early detection with prompt intervention and coordinated care can optimize developmental potential and improve outcomes across the life course.

Equity, Social Determinants, and Human Capital

While biology provides the foundation for development, the environments in which children grow ultimately decide whether their developmental potential is realized.^6,12-14 Opportunities during the first 1,000 days are shaped by families, communities, education systems, healthcare services, and broader social and economic conditions. Understanding this critical period, therefore, requires not only an appreciation of developmental science but also recognition of the social determinants that influence child health and well-being.

Children do not begin life with equal opportunities. Poverty, education, housing, food security, disability, discrimination, and access to healthcare all influence developmental outcomes, often before birth.^{6,12,13,35,40} Health inequities established during early life may persist across generations.¹⁴ Children exposed to disadvantage frequently experience cumulative barriers affecting health, educational achievement, social participation, and employment opportunities.⁶ Addressing these inequities is essential. Health equity recognizes every child’s right, regardless of disabilities or circumstances, to an equal opportunity to grow, develop, and thrive to their fullest potential.

Economic evidence strongly supports investment in early childhood.^9-11,40 The Heckman Curve demonstrates that the returns on investments in human capital are greatest when interventions occur early in life.⁹ Programs implemented during pregnancy and early childhood generate substantially greater benefits than those introduced later through schooling, workforce training, or remedial programs. Long-term follow-up studies such as the Abecedarian Project have demonstrated significant returns through improved education, employment, health, and productivity.¹⁰ These benefits arise because early interventions improve educational achievement, health outcomes, and social participation throughout the life course. Investments during the first 1,000 days, therefore, generate returns not only for individual children and families, but also for healthcare systems, economies, and societies.

High-quality early childhood care and education programs further improve cognitive, behavioral, educational, and socioeconomic outcomes, particularly among disadvantaged children.¹¹ Importantly, developmental trajectories established during infancy can still be strengthened through sustained nurturing care, responsive caregiving, early learning opportunities, and supportive environments.^3,4,7 Child development is therefore not solely a family responsibility but a shared societal responsibility with long-term health, social, and economic returns.^7,37

Therefore, the first 1,000 days constitute not only a health issue but also a matter of social justice, equity, human capital development, and national prosperity.

Building Collaborative Ecosystems for Child Health

The complexity of child development requires collaboration across disciplines and sectors. Healthcare professionals alone cannot optimize child outcomes without support from educators, policymakers, social protection systems, communities, and families. The African proverb, “It takes a village to raise a child,” remains highly relevant in modern child health. No single profession, service, or sector can fully address the complex determinants of child development.

Maternal and child health services provide important platforms for integrating early childhood development and interventions because they reach families from pregnancy onward. However, sustainable improvements require broader systems of support. Parenting programs, family mental health services, early childhood education, equitable access to healthcare, safe neighborhoods, and supportive social policies all contribute to healthy development.⁷

Improving child outcomes requires a life-course and systems-based approach rather than reliance on any single intervention. Prenatal care lays the foundation for healthy development, but sustained gains require coordinated support across multiple domains throughout childhood.^4,10 Family-focused interventions such as parenting programs and support for home learning environments must work alongside investments in healthcare, education, and social services.³⁴ These efforts are further strengthened by policies that support housing, income security, childcare, and parental leave.

Historically, child health services have often been organized around professional disciplines and institutional boundaries. However, the needs of children rarely fit neatly within such structures. Developmental challenges, educational needs, family stressors, social disadvantages, and health concerns frequently coexist. Addressing these interconnected issues requires genuine collaboration rather than parallel practice. Integrated systems of care allow developmental, educational, psychosocial, and health needs to be addressed together rather than through fragmented services.^7,30,37 Effective child development strategies, therefore, require coordinated action across health, education, nutrition, social protection, and community sectors.^7,37

Shared responsibility is essential. Healthcare professionals support survival, growth, developmental promotion, and early detection of at-risk children; educators promote learning and inclusion; policymakers create enabling systems; communities provide belonging and support; and families offer nurturing relationships and responsive care. When these sectors work together, children are more likely to thrive and achieve their developmental potential.

For pediatric and child health professionals, translating the science of the first 1,000 days into practical action is both an opportunity and a responsibility. It requires action at multiple levels, from promoting healthy development and empowering families to identifying risks early and advocating for supportive policies and services. Box 1 summarizes key actions pediatric and child health professionals can take during this critical period. Achieving these goals requires moving beyond traditional healthcare boundaries through collaboration with parents, educators, early intervention providers, social services, community organizations, policymakers, and the media. Taken together, the evidence reviewed in this article indicates that optimizing outcomes during the first 1,000 days requires not only evidence-based interventions but also integrated and collaborative child health systems that coordinate care across sectors and throughout the life course. Such an approach is fundamental to ensuring that every child has the opportunity to survive, thrive, and reach their full potential. Ultimately, ensuring that no child is left behind during the first 1,000 days requires a shared commitment to translating the science of early life into coordinated actions that reach every family, clinic, and community.

Challenges and Future Directions

Despite growing recognition of the importance of early childhood development, substantial challenges remain. An estimated 250 million children in low- and middle-income countries, including Malaysia, are at risk of not reaching their developmental potential due to poverty and stunting alone.^2,30,41 Workforce shortages, fragmented services, inequitable healthcare access, financial constraints, and limited developmental resources continue to impede progress.

Global challenges further threaten gains in early childhood development. Climate change, armed conflict, population displacement, pandemics, and economic instability can disrupt healthcare services, immunization programs, food security, safe water supplies, and nurturing environments that are essential during the first 1,000 days.^7,11 These interconnected threats disproportionately affect vulnerable families and may widen existing developmental and health inequities.

At the same time, emerging opportunities offer reasons for optimism. Digital health technologies, community partnerships, caregiver education programs, developmental screening tools, and integrated models of care have the potential to improve access, early identification, and intervention, particularly in resource-constrained settings where specialist services remain limited.^36,39

Future child health systems should strengthen maternal and child health services, integrate developmental surveillance into routine care, expand access to early intervention, support parents and caregivers, and address the social determinants that influence child development.^2,7,30,40 Greater emphasis is also needed on implementation research, workforce development, and scalable models that promote collaboration across health, education, and social sectors. Translating the science of the first 1,000 days into equitable and sustainable systems of care remains both a major challenge and an important opportunity for child health in the decades ahead.

Conclusion

The first 1,000 days represent a unique opportunity to influence lifelong health, development, resilience, and human potential. Experiences during this critical period shape not only individual futures but also the health, productivity, and prosperity of nations. Scientific advances have reinforced what many cultures have long understood: early life matters profoundly. The challenge is no longer understanding why the first 1,000 days matter but translating this knowledge into coordinated actions that benefit children and families.

Optimizing outcomes demands a shift from treating illnesses alone to building health early, from isolated professional practice to integrated, collaborative ecosystems, and from hospital-centered care to strong community partnerships. Ensuring that every child has the opportunity to thrive during the first 1,000 days is both a medical responsibility and a societal commitment.

Ultimately, the first 1,000 days should not be viewed as a discrete program or a narrowly defined health initiative. Rather, it provides a life-course framework for understanding how biological, developmental, social, and environmental influences interact to shape lifelong health and well-being. The evidence reviewed in this article demonstrates that optimizing outcomes during this critical period requires not only evidence-based interventions but also integrated, collaborative child health systems that coordinate care across sectors and throughout the life course. Translating this knowledge into policies, services, and everyday practices that reach every child, family, and community remains both an urgent responsibility and an extraordinary opportunity.

Author Contributions

THT conceived and designed the article, conducted review and prepared the initial manuscript draft. AST, SFN, HHH, KMK, LTT, YLT and AMAM discussed the conceptualization of the article and advised on the content. AZT assisted THT with the conceptualization of the article and drafting the initial manuscript. All authors critically revised manuscript approved the final version and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors had full access to the manuscript and shared responsibility for the decision to submit it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

No honorarium, grant, or other form of payment was given to anyone to produce the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Director General of Health Malaysia for permission to publish this manuscript. They also acknowledge the Local Organizing Committee of the Second Malaysian Conference on Paediatrics and Child Health (2nd MCPaCH), held in Penang, Malaysia, from 7–10 May 2026. The conference theme, "The First 1,000 Days: Building the Foundation for Lifelong Health", and the multidisciplinary discussions that took place during the conference helped shape the ideas and perspectives presented in this review.

REFERENCES

1. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Rizvi A, Gaffey MF, Walker N, Horton S, et al.; Lancet Nutrition Interventions Review Group, Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: What can be done and at what cost? Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):452-77. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60996-4. Erratum in: Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):396.
2. Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, de Onis M, et al.; Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):427-51. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X. Erratum in: Lancet. 2013. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):396.
3. Black MM, Walker SP, Fernald LCH, Andersen CT, DiGirolamo AM, Lu C, et al.; Lancet Early Childhood Development Series Steering Committee. Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course. Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):77-90. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31389-7.
4. Britto PR, Lye SJ, Proulx K, Yousafzai AK, Matthews SG, Vaivada T, et al.; Early Childhood Development Interventions Review Group, for the Lancet Early Childhood Development Series Steering Committee. Nurturing care: promoting early childhood development. Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):91-102. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31390-3.
5. Nelson CA. Chapter 8, titled “The Developing Brain”. In “From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development”. Shonkoff JP, Phillips DA (Eds.). (2000). National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. p 182-217.
6. Shonkoff JP, Garner AS; Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health; Committee on Early Childhood, Adoption, and Dependent Care; Section on Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics. 2012 Jan;129(1):e232-46. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-2663.
7. Toh TH. A review on the early life experience and lifelong health. Malays J Paediatr Child Health, May 2025; 31(S1):54-63. doi:10.51407/mjpch.v31iS1.380
8. World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund, World Bank Group. Nurturing care for early childhood development: A framework for helping children survive and thrive to transform health and human potential. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Available at: https://www.who.int/teams/maternal-newborn-child-adolescent-health-and-ageing/child-health/nurturing-care. Accessed June 1, 2026.
9. Doyle O, Harmon CP, Heckman JJ, Tremblay RE. Investing in early human development: timing and economic efficiency. Econ Hum Biol. 2009 Mar;7(1):1-6. doi:10.1016/j.ehb.2009.01.002.
10. Barnett WS, Masse LN. Comparative benefit-cost analysis of the Abecedarian program and its policy implications. Econ Educ Rev. 26 (1), 113-25. doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.10.007.
11. Draper CE, Yousafzai AK, McCoy DC, Cuartas J, Obradović J, Bhopal S, et al. The next 1000 days: building on early investments for the health and development of young children. Lancet. 2024 Nov 23;404(10467):2094-116. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01389-8.
12. Lacagnina S. The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD). Am J Lifestyle Med. 2019 Oct 11;14(1):47-50. doi:10.1177/1559827619879694.
13. Barker DJ. The developmental origins of adult disease. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004 Dec;23(6 Suppl):588S-95S. doi:10.1080/07315724.2004.10719428.
14. Heijmans BT, Tobi EW, Stein AD, Putter H, Blauw GJ, Susser ES, et al. Persistent epigenetic differences associated with prenatal exposure to famine in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 4;105(44):17046-9. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806560105.
15. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549912. Accessed June 1, 2026.
16. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for care of the preterm or low-birth-weight infant. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240058262. Accessed June 1, 2026
17. De-Regil LM, Peña-Rosas JP, Fernández-Gaxiola AC, Rayco-Solon P. Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 14;2015(12):CD007950. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007950.pub3.
18. Simões EAF, Pahud BA, Madhi SA, Kampmann B, Shittu E, Radley D, et al.; MATISSE (Maternal Immunization Study for Safety and Efficacy) Clinical Trial Group. Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the MATISSE maternal respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein vaccine trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Feb 1;145(2):157-67. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005816.
19. Sonu S, Post S, Feinglass J. Adverse childhood experiences and the onset of chronic disease in young adulthood. Prev Med. 2019 Jun;123:163-70. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.032. 
20. Miller GE, Chen E, Parker KJ. Psychological stress in childhood and susceptibility to the chronic diseases of aging: moving toward a model of behavioral and biological mechanisms. Psychol Bull. 2011 Nov;137(6):959-97. doi:10.1037/a0024768.
21. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in underweight and obesity from 1990 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 3663 population-representative studies with 222 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2024 Mar 16;403(10431):1027-1050. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02750-2. 
22. Horta BL, Loret de Mola C, Victora CG. Breastfeeding and intelligence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015 Dec;104(467):14-9. doi:10.1111/apa.13139.
23. Horta BL, Loret de Mola C, Victora CG. Long-term consequences of breastfeeding on cholesterol, obesity, systolic blood pressure and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015 Dec;104(467):30-7. doi:10.1111/apa.13133.
24. Horta BL, Rollins N, Dias MS, Garcez V, Pérez-Escamilla R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of breastfeeding and later overweight or obesity expands on previous study for World Health Organization. Acta Paediatr. 2023 Jan;112(1):34-41. doi:10.1111/apa.16460. 
25. WHO Immediate KMC Study Group; Arya S, Naburi H, Kawaza K, Newton S, Anyabolu CH, Bergman N, et al. Immediate "Kangaroo Mother Care" and survival of infants with low birth weight. N Engl J Med. 2021 May 27;384(21):2028-38. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2026486.
26. Charpak N, Tessier R, Ruiz JG, Hernandez JT, Uriza F, Villegas J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of Kangaroo Mother Care versus traditional care. Pediatrics. 2017 Jan;139(1):e20162063. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-63.
27. Mørdre M, Ørbeck B, Hoel RE, Øvergaard KR. Food selectivity in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders - A systematic literature review. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2024 Nov 11;144(14). English, Norwegian. doi:10.4045/tidsskr.24.0193.
28. Andre FE, Booy R, Bock HL, Clemens J, Datta SK, John TJ, et al. Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death and inequity worldwide. Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Feb;86(2):140-6. doi:10.2471/blt.07.040089.
29. World Health Organization. Immunization Agenda 2030: A Global Strategy to Leave No One Behind. WHO, April 1, 2020. Geneva, World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/immunization-agenda-2030-a-global-strategy-to-leave-no-one-behind. Accessed June 1, 2026
30. Richter LM, Daelmans B, Lombardi J, Heymann J, Boo FL, Behrman JR, et al.; Paper 3 Working Group and the Lancet Early Childhood Development Series Steering Committee. Investing in the foundation of sustainable development: pathways to scale up for early childhood development. Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):103-18. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31698-1.
31. World Health Organization. Guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep for children under 5 years of age. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550536. Accessed June 1, 2026.
32. Madigan S, McArthur BA, Anhorn C, Eirich R, Christakis DA. Associations between screen use and child language skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Jul 1;174(7):665-75. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0327. Erratum in: JAMA Pediatr. 2022 May 1;176(5):528. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.0738. 
33. Council on Communications and Media. Media and young minds. Pediatrics. 2016 Nov;138(5):e20162591. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2591.
34. Jeong J, Franchett EE, Ramos de Oliveira CV, Rehmani K, Yousafzai AK. Parenting interventions to promote early child development in the first three years of life: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2021 May 10;18(5):e1003602. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003602. 
35. Walker SP, Wachs TD, Grantham-McGregor S, Black MM, Nelson CA, Huffman SL, et al. Inequality in early childhood: risk and protective factors for early child development. Lancet. 2011 Oct 8;378(9799):1325-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60555-2.
36. Lipkin PH, Macias MM; Council on Children with Disabilities, Section on Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. Promoting optimal development: identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders through developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics. 2020 Jan;145(1):e20193449. doi:10.1542/peds.2019-3449.
37. Barnett SW. Long-term effects of early childhood programs on cognitive and school outcomes. Future Child. 1995 Winter; 5(3):25-50.
38. Goldfeld S, Raman S, Eapen V, et al. Beyond the silver bullet: Closing the equity gap for children within a generation. Med J Aust. 2024;221(10):508-11. doi:10.5694/mja2.52493
39. Toh TH, Lim YM, Lee JS, Chan WN, Low ZY, Dahian K, et al. Case-control accuracy study for TOY8 digital developmental screening tool for detecting delays among children aged 3-5 years. Front Pediatr. 2025 Dec 2;13:1706162. doi:10.3389/fped.2025.1706162.
40. Onsomu LK, Ng’eno H. The importance of investing in the first 1000 days of life: Evidence and policy options. Economies. 2025;13(4),105:1-22 doi.org/10.3390/
41. Institute for Public Health. National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2022: Maternal and Child Health Fact Sheet. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Health Malaysia; 2023.